Acts 4

÷÷ACTS 4

ACTS 4

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4	NKJV	NRSV	TEV	NJB
Peter and John Before the Council	Peter and John Arrested	Arrest and Release of Peter and John	Peter and John Before the Council	Peter and John Before the Sanhedrin
4:1-4	4:1-4	4:1-4	4:1-4	4:1-4
	Addressing the Sanhedrin
4:5-22	4:5-12	4:5-12	4:5-7	4:5-12
(11)	The Name of Jesus Forbidden	(11)	4:8-12 (11)
	4:13-22	4:13-22	4:13-17	4:13-17
			4:18-22	4:18-22
The Believers Pray for Boldness	Prayer for Boldness		The Believers Pray for Boldness	The Apostles’ Prayer Under Persecution
4:23-31 (25b-26)	4:23-31 (25b-26)	4:23-31 (25b-26)	4:23-30 (25b-26)	4:23-26 (25b-26)
				4:27-31
			4:31
All Things in Common	Sharing All Things	The Sharing of Goods (4:32-5:6)	The Believers Share Their Possessions	The Early Christian Community
4:32-37	4:32-37	4:32-5:11	4:32-35	4:32
				4:33
				4:34-35
				The Generosity of Barnabas
			4:36-37	4:36-37

READING CYCLE THREE (see
“Bible
Interpretation Seminar”)

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR’S INTENT AT PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which
means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the
light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not
relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects (reading cycle #3). Compare
your subject divisions with the five translations above. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is
the key to following the original author’s intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every
paragraph has one and only one subject.

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

It is obvious the chapter divisions are inappropriate in Acts. Remember, chapter divisions,
verse divisions, capitalization, paragraphing, and punctuation all are not original to the
Greek text and, therefore, are the work of modern translation committees.
Verses 1-31 deal with the lame man’s healing in Acts 3 and its consequences.
Verses 32-37 should go with Acts 5:1-11.
The problems of the early church continue and multiply, but so does the grace and power of the Spirit.
In dealing with Luke’s emphasis on the loving, giving nature of the early church in Jerusalem,
modern western interpreters must guard against a “capitalistic” bias. Luke seems to affirm
voluntary mutuality. Acts cannot support communism nor capitalism because neither was known
at that time. The text must be interpreted in light of its day, its author’s intent, and its
hearers’ world.

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

÷ACTS 4:1-4

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: ACTS 4:1-4
¹As they were speaking to the people, the priests and the
captain of the temple guard and the Sadducees came up to them, ²being greatly disturbed
because they were teaching the people and proclaiming in Jesus the resurrection from the dead. ³And
they laid hands on them and put them in jail until the next day, for it was already evening. ⁴But
many of those who had heard the message believed; and the number of the men came to be about five thousand.

4:1 “the priests” This is the word used in the ancient uncial Greek manuscripts
א, A, D, and E, but MS C has “high priests” (archiereis). The
UBS⁴ gives “priests” a B rating (almost certain).

In the OT the tribe of Levi (i.e., Moses and Aaron’s tribe) was selected to serve
YHWH in the stead of the “first born” (cf. Exodus 13). Within this tribe were certain families who served as

local teachers of the Law
temple servants
priests who officiated at the temple, especially involved in the sacrificial procedures
(cf. Leviticus1-7)

The special family from which the High Priest must come was the family of Moses and Aaron. This
whole tribe did not receive a land allotment like the other tribes of Jacob/Israel. They had certain cities
partially given to them (i.e., 48 Levitical cities, cf. Joshua 20). These Levitical families depended on
the other tribes to support them through the Temple tithe and the third-year local tithe.

All of this changed when Rome took over Palestine. The office of High Priest was purchased
from Rome. No longer was it an OT spiritual office, but a commercial, political power office.

The current High Priest was Caiaphas (cf. Matt. 26:3; Luke 3:2; John 18), but the real
power behind the office was the former High Priest Annas (cf. Luke 3:2; John 18:13,24; Acts 4:6). This
family was of the Sadducean sect of Judaism.

▣ “the captain of the temple guard“ This was a special Levitical office which was
next in power to the High Priest (cf. Josephus, Wars 6.5.3). He would have controlled the temple
police (cf. 1 Chr. 9:11; Neh. 11:11; Luke 22:4,52; Acts 5:24,26). In Hebrew he was called “the man of
the mountain of the house.”

▣ “Sadducees” These were the rich, political leaders of the Sanhedrin.

SPECIAL TOPIC: SADDUCEES

SPECIAL TOPIC: SANHEDRIN

4:2
NASB, NKJV	”being greatly disturbed”
NKJV	”much annoyed”
TEV	”were annoyed”
NJB	”extremely annoyed”
Peshitta	”being infuriated”

This rare Greek term (here a PRESENT MIDDLE [deponent] PARTICIPLE)
means “to work hard at something.” It is found only one other place in Acts (16:18). It is not found in the
Septuagint, nor the Koine papyri from Egypt (see Moulton and Milligan, “Vocabulary of the Greek Testament Illustrated
from Papyri and Non-literary Sources.”

The Sadducean leadership was upset because the Christian leaders were teaching the crowds
at the temple in Jesus’ name and proclaiming His resurrection (which Sadducees denied, as well as the
theological concept of resurrections in general). It is also possible from the wording of Acts 4:2 that
the Apostles were not only asserting Jesus’ resurrection, but the full implications of all believers’
resurrection (cf. 1 Corinthians 15).

4:3 “they” In Acts 4:2 the antecedent was Peter, John, and even possibly the healed lame man.
In Acts 4:3 the antecedent is the priests and temple police.

▣ “laid hands on them” This Greek VERB has a wide semantic field, but
Luke often uses it in this sense of arrest (cf. Luke 20:19; 21:12; Acts 5:18; 12:1; 21:27).

SPECIAL TOPIC: HAND

▣ “until the next day” Jewish law forbade a trial to be held after twilight. These leaders
wanted this preaching/teaching stopped and stopped immediately. So they jailed them overnight somewhere
on the Temple grounds, as opposed to a public jail (cf. Acts 5:18).

4:4 “those who had heard. . .believed” Both of these VERBALS are AORIST
TENSE. Faith begins with hearing (cf. Rom. 10:17). Hearing the gospel results (with the
Spirit’s aid, cf. John 6:44,65; 16:8-11) in believing the gospel.

SPECIAL TOPIC:
SALVATION (Greek verb tenses)

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE GOSPEL

▣ “the number of men came to be about five thousand” Notice that this number does not
include women and children. Often in the NT it is implied that the belief of the father extended to
and included the whole family (cf. Acts 11:14; 16:15,31,33). The group in the upper room numbered
about 120. At Pentecost 3,000 were added (cf. Acts 2:41); now the number of believers was up to
5,000! The church in Jerusalem is growing rapidly!

÷ACTS 4:5-12

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: ACTS 4:5-12
⁵On the next day, their rulers and elders and scribes were
gathered together in Jerusalem; ⁶and Annas the high priest was there, and Caiaphas and John
and Alexander, and all who were of high-priestly descent. ⁷When they had placed them in the center,
they began to inquire, “By what power, or in what name, have you done this?” ⁸Then Peter,
filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, “Rulers and elders of the people, ⁹if we are on trial
today for a benefit done to a sick man, as to how this man has been made well, ¹⁰let it be known to
all of you and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified,
whom God raised from the dead—by this name this man stands here before you in good health.
¹¹He is the stone which was rejected
by you, the builders,
but which became the chief
cornerstone.
¹²And there is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved.”

4:5 “their rulers and elders and scribes” The Sanhedrin (i.e., the Council, 5:21, from the
Jerusalem area; the Council of the elders, 22:5) was made up of seventy Jewish leaders. It was the
highest political/religious body (which Rome allowed) within Judaism of Jesus’ day. The concept was
begun (i.e., Jewish tradition) by Ezra and the “men of the Great Synagogue.” It is usually identified
in the NT by the phrase, “the scribes, elders and high priests” (cf. Luke 23:13; Acts 3:17; 4:5,8; 13:27).

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE SANHEDRIN

4:6 “Annas” His name in Greek is Hannas; Josephus calls him Hannanos (Jonathan). The name seems
to come from the Hebrew “merciful” or “gracious” (hānān, BDB 336).

In the OT the high priesthood was for life and stayed in the lineage of Aaron. However,
the Romans had turned this office into a political plumb, purchased by a Levitical family. The high
priest controlled and operated the merchandising in the Court of the Women. Jesus’ cleansing of the
Temple angered this family.

According to Flavius Josephus, Annas was the High Priest from A.D. 6-14. He
was appointed by Quirinius, governor of Syria and removed by Valerius Gratus. His relatives
(5 sons and 1 grandson) succeeded him. Caiaphas (A.D. 18-36), his son-in-law
(cf. John 18:13), was his immediate successor. Annas was the real power behind the office. John
depicts him as the first person to whom Jesus is taken (cf. Acts 18:13,19-22).

▣ “Caiaphas” He was appointed high priest by Valerius Gratus, procurator of Judea
(cf. MS D, ‘Iōnathas, cf. NEB, NJB) from A.D. 18-36.

▣ “John” This may refer to “Jonathan,” who Josephus tells us was also one of Annas’
sons who became High Priest in A.D. 36 after Caiaphas. However, the UBS⁴
has ‘Iōannēs (i.e., John) as an A rating (certain); even the REB goes back to “John.”

▣ “Alexander” Nothing is known about this man, but he, like John, was probably a member
of Annas’ family or a leading member of the Sadducean party.

4:7 “When they had placed them in the center” The members of the Sanhedrin sat in a semicircle on
a raised platform.

▣ “they began to inquire” This is an IMPERFECT TENSE, which means
either (1) continuous action in past time or (2) the beginning of an action.

▣ “By what power, or in what name” They insinuated that the healing was done by magical
power (cf. Acts 19:13). They tried this same trick on Jesus (cf. Luke 11:14-26; Mark 3:20-30). They
could not deny the miracles so they attempted to impugn the method or source of the power.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE NAME OF
THE LORD

4:8 “filled with the Holy Spirit” The Spirit was the source of wisdom and boldness for the
Apostles (cf. Luke 12:11-12; 21:12-15). Remember this was the same man who only a few days earlier
had denied the Lord out of fear (cf. Acts 4:13). Notice that Peter was “filled” (cf. Acts 2:4; 4:8,31).
This shows that it was a repeatable experience (cf. Eph. 5:18). See full note at Acts 5:17.

SPECIAL TOPIC: FILLED WITH THE SPIRIT

4:9 “if” This is a FIRST CLASS CONDITIONAL SENTENCE which is assumed true for
the author’s purpose.

▣ “if we are on trial today” This Greek term literally means “examined by a court”
(cf. Acts 12:19; 24:8; 28:18; Luke 23:14). It was used of the Berean Jews examining the Scriptures
to see if Paul was accurately interpreting them (cf. Acts 17:11).

▣ “for a benefit done to a sick man” Peter is asserting the inappropriateness of this
official trial with such a hostile environment concerning a wonderful miracle of healing and mercy. They
should be praising God instead!

▣ “has been made well” This is a PERFECT PASSIVE INDICATIVE meaning complete
health and restoration of his legs.

4:10 “Let it be known to all of you and all the people of Israel” This is a PERFECT ACTIVE
IMPERATIVE. The Spirit has emboldened Peter. He is not intimidated by the judicial setting. These
leaders could not keep Christ in the tomb and they could not deny the healed man standing in front of them!

▣ “by the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene” Peter picks up on their question and answers
specifically how the miracle occurred.

SPECIAL TOPIC: JESUS THE NAZARENE

SPECIAL TOPIC: CHRIST JESUS AS LORD

▣ “whom you crucified” This was the obvious truth. They instigated His death. Notice “by you”
in Acts 4:11, which also asserts their guilt.

SPECIAL TOPIC: CRUCIFIXION

▣ “whom God raised” The NT affirms that all three persons of the Trinity were active in Jesus’
resurrection:

Spirit, Rom. 8:11
Jesus, John 2:19-22; 10:17-18
Father, Acts 2:24,32; 3:15,26; 4:10; 5:30; 10:40; 13:30,33,34,37; 17:31; Rom. 6:4,9

This was confirmation of the truth of Jesus’ life and teachings about God and also the
Father’s full acceptance of Jesus’ substitutionary death. This was a major aspect of the Kerygma
(i.e., sermons in Acts).

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE KERYGMA OF
THE EARLY CHURCH

SPECIAL TOPIC: RESURRECTION

▣ “this man stands here” This is a word play on “stands.” The lame man stands up and
stands before them.

4:11 This is a quote from Ps. 118:22, but not from the Masoretic text or Septuagint
(cf. Eph. 2:20; 1 Pet. 2:4ff). Jesus uses this of Himself in Mark 12:10 and Luke 20:17, taken
from the Septuagint. It signifies the fulfillment of OT prophecy of a rejected Messiah who has
become the very heart of God’s eternal plan for the redemption of Israel and the world. This
was a shocking statement for these Jewish leaders (cf. 1 Tim. 2:5).

SPECIAL TOPIC: YHWH’S ETERNAL
REDEMPTIVE PLAN

NASB	”the chief corner stone”
NKJV	”the chief cornerstone”
NRSV, NJB, Peshitta, REB	”the cornerstone”
TEV	”stone. . .the most important of all”

SPECIAL TOPIC: CORNERSTONE

4:12 “there is salvation in no one else” This is a strong DOUBLE NEGATIVE. There is
no salvation in Abraham or Moses (cf. John 14:6; 1 Tim. 2:5; 1 John 5:10-12). What a shocking claim! It
is very restrictive but also very obvious that Jesus believed that only through a personal relationship
with Himself can one know God. Peter boldly proclaims this to that elite Jewish leadership. This has
often been called the exclusivistic scandal of Christianity. There is no middle ground here. This statement
is true or Christianity is false!

▣ “there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men” The PARTICIPLE
“has been given” is a PERFECT PASSIVE. God has ordained this! Jesus is His answer to
mankind’s spiritual need. There is no Plan B! For a good book on the exclusivistic claims of Christianity
see H. A. Netland, Dissonant Voices: Religious Pluralism and the Question of Truth.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE NAME OF THE LORD

▣ “among men” Notice the universal element (cf. John 3:16; 4:42; Acts 17:30; Rom. 11:32;
1 Tim. 2:4,6; 410; Titus 2:11; Heb. 2:9; 2 Pet. 3:9; 1 John 2:2; 4:14).

▣ “by which we must be saved” This phrase has two VERBALS.

dei, PRESENT ACTIVE INDICATIVE, “we must” (see full note on dei
at Acts 1:16)
sōthēnai, AORIST PASSIVE INFINITIVE of sōzō,
“to be saved”

The word for “save” has two usages in the NT.

physical deliverance (OT sense, cf. Matt. 9:22; Mark 6:56; Luke 1:71; 6:9; 7:50; Acts 27:20,31;
James 1:21; 2:14; 4:12; 5:20)
spiritual salvation (NT usages, cf. Luke 19:10; Acts 2:21,40,47; 11:14; 15:11; 16:30-31)

The lame man experienced both. The religious leaders needed to trust Jesus as their
only hope for acceptance and forgiveness! Humans need to be saved (cf. Rom. 1:18-3:20) and Jesus is
the only way for this to be accomplished (cf. Rom. 3:21-31). The OT quote in Acts 4:12 shows He has
always been God’s plan (cf. Isa. 8:14-15; 28:14-19; 52:13-53:12).

SPECIAL TOPIC: GREEK
VERB TENSES USED FOR SALVATION

SPECIAL TOPIC: SALVATION (OT)

÷ACTS 4:13-22

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: ACTS 4:13-22
¹³Now as they observed the confidence of Peter and John and understood that they were uneducated and untrained men, they were amazed, and began to recognize them as having been with Jesus. ¹⁴And seeing the man who had been healed standing with them, they had nothing to say in reply. ¹⁵But when they had ordered them to leave the Council, they began to confer with one another, ¹⁶saying, “What shall we do with these men? For the fact that a noteworthy miracle has taken place through them is apparent to all who live in Jerusalem, and we cannot deny it. ¹⁷But so that it will not spread any further among the people, let us warn them to speak no longer to any man in this name.” ¹⁸And when they had summoned them, they commanded them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus. ¹⁹But Peter and John answered and said to them, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to give heed to you rather than to God, you be the judge; ²⁰for we cannot stop speaking about what we have seen and heard.” ²¹When they had threatened them further, they let them go (finding no basis on which to punish them) on account of the people, because they were all glorifying God for what had happened; ²²for the man was more than forty years old on whom this miracle of healing had been performed.

4:13 “the confidence” See
SPECIAL TOPIC: BOLDNESS
(parrhēsia)

▣ “uneducated” The term is agrammatos, which is the term “writing” with the
ALPHA PRIVATIVE. This may mean that they were

ignorant or uneducated (cf. Moulton, Milligan, Vocabulary, p. 6)
untrained in the rabbinical schools (cf. A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the Greek
New Testament, vol. 3, p. 52 and Louw and Nida, Lexicon, vol. 1, p. 328)

▣ “untrained” This is the term idiōtēs, which is usually translated
“layman” or “untrained in a certain area.” Originally it referred to a normal person as opposed
to a leader or spokesperson. It came to be used of an outsider vs. a member of a group
(cf. 1 Cor. 14:16,23-24; 2 Cor. 11:6).

Notice how the different English translations handle this phrase.

NASB, NKJV ‒ “uneducated and untrained men”
NRSV ‒ “uneducated and ordinary men”
TEV ‒ “ordinary men of no education”
NJB, REB ‒ “uneducated layman”
Peshitta ‒ “unlearned and ignorant men”

▣ “they were amazed” This is an IMPERFECT ACTIVE INDICATIVE (as are the
next two verbs). They imply either the beginning of an action or repeated action in past time
(INDICATIVE MOOD). Luke uses this word often (18 times in Luke and Acts); it usually,
but not always, has a positive connotation (cf. Luke 11:38; 20:26; Acts 4:13; 13:41).

▣ “began to recognize them as having been with Jesus” This was in truth a compliment.
Jesus was also untrained in the rabbinical schools, yet He knew the Old Testament well. He did attend
synagogue school as all Jewish children (as did Peter and John) were required to do.

These leaders recognized the boldness and power of Peter and John. They had seen the
same in Jesus.

4:14 Everyone knew this lame man because he regularly sat at the temple door daily. But he was
not sitting anymore! The crowd in the temple could not deny this (cf. Acts 4:16,22).

4:15 They asked the three of them to leave while they discussed their options and planned their
strategy of denial and deception (cf. Acts 4:17-18).

4:17-18 This was their plan! Stop talking about Jesus and stop helping people in His name! What
about all the people who were praising God for the healing (cf. Acts 3:8-9; 4:16)?

4:19 “whether” This is a FIRST CLASS CONDITIONAL SENTENCE which is used not of
reality, but for the sake of argument. Peter and John did not think their commands were valid (cf. Acts 5:28).

▣ “you be the judge” This is an AORIST ACTIVE IMPERATIVE. These leaders
condemned themselves by their words, motives, and actions.

4:20 Peter and John assert that they cannot deny what they have experienced and they will not
stop sharing it!

4:21 “when they had threatened them further” I wonder what they threatened to do. Jesus was raised
from the dead. The man was raised from his bed; what were these leaders going to do to Peter and John?

▣ “(finding no basis on which to punish them)” This may indicate one of Luke’s purposes in
writing. Christianity was not a threat to Rome or the peace of Jerusalem. Even the Sanhedrin could find
no grounds to condemn its leaders.

▣ “on account of the people” The eyewitnesses of the events in Jerusalem held the early
church in high esteem (cf. Acts 2:47). The Jewish leaders were threatened by this popularity
(cf. Acts 5:13,26).

÷ACTS 4:23-31

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: ACTS 4:23-31
²³When they had been released, they went to their
own companions and reported all that the chief priests and the elders had said to them. ²⁴And
when they heard this, they lifted their voices to God with one accord and said, “O Lord, it is You
who made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and all that is in them,
²⁵who by the Holy Spirit, through the mouth of our father David Your servant, said,
‘Why did the Gentiles rage,
And the peoples devise futile things?
²⁶‘The kings of the earth took their stand,
And the rulers were gathered together
Against the Lord and against His Christ.’
²⁷“For truly in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus, whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, ²⁸to do whatever Your hand and Your purpose predestined to occur. ²⁹“And now, Lord, take note of their threats, and grant that Your bond-servants may speak Your word with all confidence, ³⁰while You extend Your hand to heal, and signs and wonders take place through the name of Your holy servant Jesus.” ³¹And when they had prayed, the place where they had gathered together was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak the word of God with boldness.

4:23 They went back to the Upper Room to meet with the disciples.

4:24 “with one accord” This unity of heart and mind characterized the early church
(cf. Acts 1:14; 2:46; 4:24; 5:12; 15:25). There is spiritual power and focused action in this
atmosphere of unity of purpose.

▣ “Lord” This is the Greek term despota, from which we get the English word
“despot.” It denoted someone in complete authority! Here it refers to God the Father (cf. Luke 2:29
and Rev. 6:10). It is also used of Jesus (cf. 2 Pet. 2:1 and Jude 1:4).

▣ “who made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and all that is in
them“ This may be an allusion to Exod. 20:11. It is also quoted in Acts 14:15 and the truth
is stated in Acts 17:24. YHWH is the creator!

SPECIAL TOPIC: HEAVEN

4:25 There are many variant readings of the first part of this verse. The oldest
manuscripts P⁷⁴, א, A, and B already include the
ambiguous variant. Although the exact wording is uncertain, the thrust of the text is obvious.
For a full account of the problem and the theories of what happened, see Bruce M. Metzger,
A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, pp. 321-323).

▣ “who by the Holy Spirit through the mouth of our father David” This asserts the
inspiration of the Old Testament (cf. Matt. 5:17-19). This is a quote from the Septuagint of
Psalm 2:1-2, a royal Messianic Psalm. Christianity is not something new, but the fulfillment of the
Old Testament (cf. Matt. 5:17-48). Worldly opposition is to be expected, but so too, is the victory of YHWH.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE BIBLE (its
uniqueness and inspiration)

4:25-26 “Gentiles. . .the peoples. . .the Kings. . .the Rulers” It looks as if the disciples are
doing a rabbinical word association on “rulers.” In a sense, they are calling the Sanhedrin Goyim
(i.e., Gentiles) or at least associating these OT names to contemporary groups (i.e., Pilate, Herod,
Sanhedrin, and Jewish mob) who participated in Jesus’ trial and crucifixion.

▣ “rage“ This is literally “to snort through one’s nose.” This
implies a haughty arrogance.

4:26 “the Lord. . .His Christ” Notice that YHWH and Messiah are both spoken of together. I am
surprised they did not quote Ps. 110:1.

It is so difficult to be a monotheist and assert the full deity of Christ and the
personality of the Spirit (cf. Acts 4:25). Yet, these three divine, eternal persons appear in unified
contexts several times in the NT (i.e., Matt. 28:19). Remember that all the writers except Luke are monotheistic Jewish
Christians. Something radical has caused them to assert a triunity (i.e., the gospel).

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE TRINITY

SPECIAL TOPIC: MONOTHEISM

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE DEITY OF
CHRIST FROM THE OT

SPECIAL TOPIC: PERSONHOOD
OF THE SPIRIT

4:27 “Your holy servant Jesus, whom You anointed” Notice these Messianic titles.

holy (cf. Acts 3:14; 4:30)
servant (pais, cf. Acts 3:13,26; 4:25,27,30. See note at Acts 3:13)
anointed (chriō, from which Christ is derived, cf Luke 4:18; Acts 4:27; 10:38)

This verse asserts several different ways that Jesus was sent and authorized by YHWH.
Jesus is God’s eternal plan and method of redemption and restoration (cf. Acts 4:28).

SPECIAL TOPIC: HOLY

SPECIAL TOPIC: YHWH’S ETERNAL
REDEMPTIVE PLAN

SPECIAL TOPIC: ANOINTING IN THE BIBLE (BDB 603)

▣ “there were gathered together against Your holy servant” Here is a list of the opponents
to Jesus in Jerusalem.

Herod, the Roman appointed Edumean ruler of Palestine (see
SPECIAL TOPIC: THE FAMILY
OF HEROD THE GREAT)
Pontius Pilate, the Roman administrative leader of Palestine (see
SPECIAL TOPIC: PONTIUS PILATE)
Gentiles, which might refer to the Roman army or proselyte Jews
the “people of Israel,” which would refer to the Jewish authorities and the Jewish mob
who asked for Barabbas to be released and Jesus to be crucified

▣ “Your holy servant” See
SPECIAL TOPIC: HOLY and
SPECIAL TOPIC: MY SERVANT

4:28 “Your hand and Your purpose predestined to occur” Even before creation God had His plan
of redemption (cf. Matt. 25:34; John 17:24; Eph. 1:4; 1 Pet. 1:20; Rev. 13:8; Acts 2:13; 3:18; 13:29;
SPECIAL TOPIC: YHWH’S ETERNAL
REDEMPTIVE PLAN). These enemies of Christ only performed that which God wanted them to perform. Jesus
came to die (cf. Isa. 53:10; Mark 10:45; 2 Cor. 5:21). The term translated here “predestine” is a compound of the
PREPOSITION “before” and “to set bounds” (cf. Rom. 8:29,30; 1 Cor. 2:7; Eph. 1:5,11).

The definitive passages on predestination in the NT are Rom. 8:28-30; Rom. 9; and
Eph. 1:3-14. These texts obviously stress that God is sovereign. He is in total control of all things,
including human history. There is a preset divine redemption plan being worked out in time. However,
this plan is not arbitrary or selective. It is based not only on God’s sovereignty and foreknowledge,
but also on His unchanging character of love, mercy, and undeserved grace.

We must be careful of our western (American) individualism or our evangelical zeal
coloring this wonderful truth. We must also guard against being polarized into the historical,
theological conflicts between Augustine and Pelegius or Calvinism and Arminianism.

Predestination is not a doctrine meant to limit God’s love, grace, and mercy, nor to
exclude some from the gospel. It is meant to strengthen believers by molding their worldview. God’s
love is for all mankind (cf. 1 Tim. 2:4; 2 Pet. 3:9). God is in control
of all things. Who or what can separate us from Him (cf. Rom. 8:31-39)? Predestination forms one
of two ways to view life. God views all history as present. Humans are time-bound. Our perspective
and mental abilities are limited. There is no contradiction between God’s sovereignty and mankind’s
free will. It is a covenantal structure. This is another example of biblical truth given in paradoxical,
dialectical, tension-filled pairs. Biblical doctrines are presented from different perspectives. They
often appear paradoxical. The truth is a balance between the seemingly opposite pairs. We must not
remove the tension by picking one of the truths. We must not isolate any biblical truth into a compartment
by itself.

It is also important to add that the goal of election is not only heaven when we die,
but Christlikeness now (cf. Rom. 8:25-30; Eph. 1:4; 2:10; 2 Cor. 3:18; Gal. 4:19; 1 Thess. 3:13; 4:3; 5:23; 2 Thess. 2:13;
Titus 2:14; 1 Pet. 1:15)! We were chosen to be “holy and blameless.” God chooses
to change us so that others may see the change and respond by faith to God in Christ. Predestination
is not a personal privilege, but a covenantal responsibility! We are saved to serve!

4:29 “speak Your word” This is a PRESENT ACTIVE INFINITIVE. This is a prayer for
continual boldness (cf. Eph. 6:19 and Col. 4:3) and an affirmation of inspiration (cf. 2 Tim. 3:15-17).

SPECIAL TOPIC: INSPIRATION

NASB	”with all confidence”
NKJV, NRSV, TEV, REB	”with all boldness”
NJB	”with all fearlessness”
Peshitta	”freely”

See
SPECIAL TOPIC: BOLDNESS
(parrhēsia)

4:30 “while you extend Your hand to heal” This was an anthropomorphic phrase used to describe
God revealing His compassion and power. The signs were a way to confirm the gospel message. It was
a radically different message from what they had heard all their lives in the synagogue.

SPECIAL TOPIC: GOD
DESCRIBED AS HUMAN

SPECIAL TOPIC: HEALING

4:31 “the place where they had gathered together was shaken” God encouraged these witnesses by
another physical demonstration of His power and presence, just as He did at Pentecost (Acts 2). The word is
used of wind blowing upon a sailing vessel.

▣ “all filled with the Holy Spirit” Notice that here again all were filled (cf. Acts 2:4;
4:8,31; 9:17; 13:9,52, see full note at Acts 5:17). This filling was for the bold proclamation of the
gospel. Also notice that tongues are not mentioned. In Acts when tongues
are mentioned, they are usually in an evangelistic context of the gospel overcoming cultural-ethnic
and/or geographical barriers.

SPECIAL TOPIC: SPIRIT FILLED

SPECIAL TOPIC: TONGUES

▣ “the word of God” The Jerome Biblical Commentary (p. 180) has a good note about this
phrase, “this is a favorite Lucan way of expressing the Christian message (see Acts 6:2,7; 8:14; 11:1;
13:5,7,44,46,48; 16:32; 17:13; 18:11). Variants of it are “the word of the Lord” (Acts 8:25; 13:49;
15:35,36; 19:10,20; 20:35) or simply “the word” (Acts 4:29; 6:4; 8:4; 10:44; 11:19; 14:25; 16:6).”

This is the central question of faith, “Is the gospel presented in the NT the word of
God?” Faith energized by the Spirit says “yes”!!

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE BIBLE
(its uniqueness and inspiration)

▣ “with boldness” See
SPECIAL TOPIC: BOLDNESS

÷ACTS 4:32-35

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: ACTS 4:32-35
³²And the congregation of those who believed were of one heart and soul; and not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them. ³³And with great power the apostles were giving testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and abundant grace was upon them all. ³⁴For there was not a needy person among them, for all who were owners of land or houses would sell them and bring the proceeds of the sales ³⁵and lay them at the apostles’ feet, and they would be distributed to each as any had need.

4:32 “who believed were of one heart and soul” The spirit of unity among the believers (cf. Acts 1:14)
reflected the unity of the Triune God (cf. John 17:11,21,23; Eph. 4:4-6). These very words are used in
Mark 12:30 to reflect the first commandment in Deut. 6:4-5.

SPECIAL TOPIC: FAITH, BELIEVE, OR TRUST

SPECIAL TOPIC: HEART

▣ “all things were common property to them” They felt and acted like a family. This was
the church’s first attempt to finance ministry. It was voluntary and mutual, not mandatory. Love and
concern, not government or social leveling, was the motive!

4:33 “were giving testimony to the resurrection” This was the central truth of their message
(cf. 1 Corinthians 15). Jesus was alive!

SPECIAL TOPIC: RESURRECTION

▣ “and abundant grace was upon them all” We learn from Paul’s letters that at a later time
this church was very poor (cf. Rom. 15:3; Gal. 2:10). Abundant grace, like abundant living (cf. John 10:10)
has little to do with material things. Notice this abundance was upon all of them, not just the leaders,
the possessors of certain gifts, or those of a certain socio-economic level.

4:34 The church felt a responsibility for one another. Those who had, gave freely to those in
need (cf. Acts 4:35). This is not communism, but love in action.

4:35 “lay them at the apostles feet” This is a cultural idiom of giving something to another. They
laid their goods and money at the Apostles’ feet because they had laid their lives at Jesus’ feet.

▣ “they would be distributed” This is an IMPERFECT PASSIVE INDICATIVE, which
shows continual action in past time. This follows the synagogue pattern of helping the poor and needy.

SPECIAL TOPIC: ALMSGIVING

▣ “as any had need” There is an interesting comment in Klein, Blomberg, and Hubbard’s
Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, pp. 451-453, that Marx’s manifesto contains two quotes
from Acts:

“from each according to his ability” – Acts 11:29
“to each according to his need”

The hermeneutical problem is that modern people try to use the Bible to support that which
the Bible itself never addressed or realized. The Bible cannot mean to us what it never meant to the
original author or hearer. We can apply the text in different ways to our cultural and existential
situation, but our application must be inseparably linked to the original author’s intended meaning.
Every biblical text has only one meaning, but many applications or significances. (See my Biblical
Interpretation Seminar
at www.freebiblecommentary.org )

÷ACTS 4:36-37

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: ACTS 4:36-37
³⁶Now Joseph, a Levite of Cyprian birth, who was also called Barnabas by the apostles (which translated means Son of Encouragement), ³⁷and who owned a tract of land, sold it and brought the money and laid it at the apostles’ feet.

4:36 “Joseph, a Levite” The Old Testament forbade priests to own land, but the Roman authorities
had changed many things in Palestine.

▣ “called Barnabas by the apostles (which translated means Son of Encouragement)” This is the
popular meaning of “Barnabas.” In Aramaic it could have meant “son of prophecy” or in Hebrew possibly
“son of Nebo” (AB, vol. 1). He was an early leader in the Jerusalem church and Paul’s friend and
missionary companion. Eusebius, an early church historian, says that he was one of the seventy in Luke 10.

SPECIAL TOPIC: BARNABAS

SPECIAL TOPIC: WEALTH

4:37 “who owned a tract of land” He was a man of means (like Nicodemus and Joseph of Aramathea). Acts 5
shows the potential for abuse in this method of financing ministry (e.g., jealousy, lying, and death).

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary which means that you are responsible for your own
interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation.
You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of
the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

Who are the Sadducees? Why were they so mad?
What is the Sanhedrin?
What is the significance of Ps. 118?
Why is Acts 4:12 so significant?
Does the predestination of Acts 4:28 refer to individuals or God’s plan of redemption? Why?
Is Luke trying to set a precedent for the church in Acts 4:32-5:11?