SPECIAL TOPIC: INSIGHTS TO EXODUS 20:12-17 (THE TEN COMMANDMENTS)
EXODUS 20:13, MURDER
(BDB 953, KB 1283)
I. CONTEXT
A. It needs to be remembered that even the commands that seem to be of
a social nature are really religious. God’s sovereignty over creation and
redemption are shadowed in these commands. The command not to murder is, in
proper focus, a word about the image of God in every human being and God’s care
and concern for human life.
B. It needs to be remembered that each command reflects the community
of faith. The prohibition on taking a life in an illegal manner is primarily and
originally focused with the believing community. Its implications are as wide as
humanity!
II. WORD STUDY OF SIGNIFICANT TERMS
A. “Murder”
1. This is a rare term (rasah, BDB 953, KB 1283) for taking a life,
used only 46 times in the OT. There are several other overlapping Hebrew terms
used hundreds of times.
2. The term (rasah) seems to have an original limited meaning
and an expanded meaning.
a. Originally it related to taking the life of a
covenant partner in a legal, premeditated way, often associated with “the
kinsman redeemer” or “go’el.” This usage involved premeditation but in a sense
of legal revenge (cf. Num. 35:30-34; Lev. 24:13-23). In reality the
Lex
Talionis, “eye for eye,” (cf. Gen. 9:5-6) was a way to limit revenge. Later, the
cities of refuge (Deut. 4:41; Josh. 20:3) were established so that a covenant
member who accidently or passionately killed another member of the community
could flee the wrath of the victim’s family.
b. Later the term came to refer to the motive or
attitude behind the taking of a life. The concept of “intentionality” becomes
uppermost! (cf. Exod. 21:12-14; Num. 35:11,22; Deut. 28:24).
c. This distinction becomes very significant in this
command. It seems in context to refer only to others within the covenant
community. It is related to the kinsman redeemer, or
blood revenge. However, the term is used in later passages which reflect the
Decalogue, Hosea 4:2 and Jeremiah 7:9, to refer to a murderer. This word relates
not only to the law but to the motive. It expands from neighbor to fellow human
being.
3. This term certainly does not relate to our modern ethical
issue of capital punishment or war. The Jews never had a problem with community
execution or holy war (or, for that matter, unholy war!).
4. The best translation for our modern culture would be
“premeditated murder.”
III. CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS
A. The sixth, seventh, and eighth commands are made up of only two
Hebrew words. They are very short and to the point.
B. Life, like all of life, is related to God. How we treat others
reflects our thoughts about God
IV. NEW TESTAMENT PARALLELS
A. Jesus
1. His expansion of this commandment (cf. Matt. 5:21-26) gives
us the proper orientation for our modern discussion about how to apply this text
to our day.
2. Jesus obviously moved the Decalogue from the realm of
actions into the realm of motives. We are what we think! “As a man thinks in his
heart, so is he.” The thought life is much more relevant and significant than we
normally give it credit.
B. John
1. 1 John. 3:15, this same concept of hate being considered
murder is stated.
2. The Greek terms used in Matthew 5:21ff and 1 John 3:15 are
different but the meaning is essentially the same.
3. Note the positive aspect in 1 John 4:19-21.
V. APPLICATION TRUTHS
A. Even though an unintentional murder can escape the blood avenger by
fleeing to a city of refuge (cf. Numbers 35; Joshua 20), he has to pay the penalty
of confinement in that city until the death of the High Priest. The consequences
of his act still remain!
B. Although this verse does not directly relate to suicide, as the
ancients probably never thought of this event, the text still gives a spiritual
principle concerning the sanctity of human life and God’s sovereignty and
purpose for human life made in His image. This text speaks a strong word to our
day in this area!
C. This text does not, however, speak a decisive word to the modern
question of: (1) capital punishment or (2) war. For Israel, these were not evil
things in themselves. The Israelites were involved in both of these acts. Still,
the principle of the significance of life made in God’s image and under His
control is an important truth in this area.
D. This text does speak a needed word about the dignity and sanctity
of human life! We in the believing community are stewards, not only of our own
actions, but of our society. The gift of life is both individual and corporate.
We are responsible for the physical, social, and psychological abuse of
our own bodies as we are the physical, social, and psychological abuse of others
in our community. This is especially true in a culture like ours where we are
allowed to speak to and, thereby, change the system. We are our brothers’
keeper!
EXODUS 20:14, ADULTERY (BDB 610, KB 658)
I. CONTEXT
A. It is obvious that the commandment is related to one’s respect for
God which is seen in respect for one’s neighbor’s life, wife, and property (cf.
Jer. 5:8). This is verified by the different order of these commands in the
Septuagint.
B. The Deuteronomic parallel shows the appropriateness of adopting
this ancient truth to our culture.
C. As respect for parents was seen as a key to a stable society, so
too, is this command.
D. This command also implies God’s ownership and control of our sexual and
family lives.
II. WORD STUDY
A.The major term in this text is “adultery.” It is crucial that one understands
this term in light of ancient Hebrew culture.
1. This term is distinct in an OT context from “fornication.” Adultery relates to at least one party in the sexual relationship being married. The term “fornication” implies both parties are not married (cf. Pro. 29:3;
31:3). The distinction is lost in the NT Greek terms.
2. This possibility explains the reason for the emphasis on
marital status because it relates to the importance of inheritance rights which
were involved in God’s promise of “the land.” Every 50 years (Jubilee) all land
was to revert to the original tribal owners (cf. Lev. 25:8-17).
3. Adultery was culturally condemned before the Mosaic
legislation (cf. Gen. 12:10ff; 26:7ff; 39:9).
4. Adultery was seen as a sin against:
a. Neighbor – Exodus 20:14; Deuteronomy 5:18
b. Marriage – Leviticus 18:20
c. God – Genesis 20:1-13; 26:7-11
5. It was punishable by death for both parties:
a. Leviticus 20:10
b. Deuteronomy 22:22-24
c. Ezekiel 16:40 (metaphor)
d. Strict warnings are found in Proverbs 1-9
III. RELATION TO NT
A. Jesus used Leviticus 19:18 as a summary of the Old Revelation (cf.
Luke 10:27). This confirms that the Ten Commandments are related to our
treatment of others.
B. Jesus intensifies the commands in Matthew 5:28. He places the
emphasis on motive rather than action. The Jews saw the mind as the seed-bed of
the soul. What one thought was what one really was (Pro. 23:7). This makes the
Ten Words almost impossible to keep—that is the purpose! (cf. Gal. 2:15-3:29).
IV. MODERN APPLICATION
A. Marriage is possibly the best modern analogy of a lifelong faith
commitment in God’s name. It is our best chance to understand the realities of
OT covenant concepts (Mal. 2:14). Our respect for our mate in all aspects,
including human sexuality, helps us comprehend the thrust of this verse.
B. Marriage stability and loyalty, like respect for parents, is a
major pillar of societal strength and longevity.
C. It needs to be emphasized that human sexuality is a gift from God (cf.
Gen. 1:27,28; 9:1,7).
It was His idea and will for humanity. The guidelines are not meant to thwart mankind’s
freedom or joy but to give some godly guidelines for fallen humanity. The bounds are
revealed for our long-term benefit and happiness. Although mankind has abused
sexuality, as they have all of God’s gifts, it is still a powerful drive within
humankind which must be under God’s control and guidance.
D. Sex must be guarded so that the sacredness of the human person
(female or male) is respected because they are made in God’s image (Gen. 1:27). Our fallen
focus on “me” is all too obvious in this area.
EXODUS 20:15, STEAL (BDB 170, KB 198)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Like all other regulations in the Decalog, our faith, love, and
respect for God must be seen in the sacred and secular aspects of our daily
lives. It is an abomination to God to claim to know Him and then exploit our
covenant partner (cf. 1 John 2:7-11; 4:20-21).
B. This command is meant to help maintain the fellowship of the
covenant community. The quality of this spiritual fellowship will attract a
confused and seeking world to our God which is the purpose of Scripture.
C. As other commandments have focused on God’s ownership of all of
life, so too, this one! We are stewards, not owners. Our fallen drive toward
possessions, without cost, is behind this prohibition (cf. Ps. 50:10-12).
II. WORD AND PHRASE STUDY
A. This is the third command in the second half of the Decalog which is
made up of only two words in Hebrew.
B. The object of the prohibition is absent. This is usually supported
by:
1. The context of the two previous commands relating to
capital offenses.
2. The presence of applicable parallel passages both immediate
(Exod. 21:16) and remote (Deut. 24:7). Also see Genesis 37.
C. However, the short form is also defensible
1. It is recorded for us by inspiration
2. It widens the scope of the injunction
3. There is also a parallel passage in the immediate context
which relates to theft—Exodus 22:1ff (not kidnaped).
4. Jesus apparently quotes this passage in reference to
stealing (cf. Matt. 19:18).
D. Theft is also dealt with in the other ancient Law Codes, but usually
the penalty is death, mutilation, or 30 times restitution.
E. There are some significant parallel passages which define and
explain this truth:
1. Leviticus 19:1-18—”You shall be holy, for I the Lord your
God am holy”
a. Our lifestyle must reflect the family
characteristics of our Father and our God (cf. Lev. 19:18).
b. Our faith must impact our lives daily, both in
positive actions and negative prohibition, both informed by proper motives (cf.
Lev. 19:17).
c. Compassion for the ostracized and needy, Lev. 19:9-10,
13, is as significant as refusal to rip off our neighbors, v. 11.
2. Amos 8:4-7 – God hates exploitations!
3. Micah 6:6-8 – God wants proper motives in all of our
actions. Why we don’t steal is the issue!
4. Exodus 22:1ff – Often the missing truth in our modern
discussion of robbery is restitution! Sin always costs!
III. APPLICATION TRUTHS
A. Joy Davidman, C. S. Lewis’ wife, has written a delightful book on
the Decalog. She translates this command “Thou shalt not try to get something
for nothing.” This assuredly widens the scope beyond possessions. She also says
that “property is neither sin nor inalienable right, but a loan, a trust from
God.”
B. Theft, like all other sins of the fallen heart, are dealt with by a
new heart (cf. Jer. 31:31-34; Ezek. 36:26; Eph. 4:28). It is amazing how the old nature of “take” turns into the
new nature of “share”!
C. Our respect for God is clearly seen in our respect for other
covenant partners! This truth overshadows the Decalog.
D. Fallen people steal in many ways!
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. How does modern man practice stealing?
2. How is restitution related to repentance?
3. How does this verse relate to capitalism’s view of property?
EXODUS 20:17, COVET (BDB 326, KB 328)
I. INTRODUCTION
A. It is possible to see the relationship between the last five
commandments as follows:
1. Number 6, 7, and 8 prohibit the injury of a covenant
partner in an overt action.
2. Number 9 prohibits the injury of a covenant partner in
speech.
3. Number 10 prohibits the injury of a covenant partner in
thought.
B. It is true that the act of coveting disrupts the person who is
coveting, not the object, the neighbor. However, it is possible that this
commandment expects that the thoughts will proceed to actions.
C. Many see this commandment as a unique concept found only in the
ancient Law Code of Israel and which is absent in the other law codes of the
Ancient Near East. This new concept would be the prohibition of thought. It is
true that Israel perceived the thought life to be the origin of evil deeds (cf.
Pro. 23:7; James 1:14-15). Yet, this verse seems to relate to thoughts which
issue in actions.
Several passages use the term “covet” in connection with a resulting action (cf.
Deut. 7:25; Jos. 7:21; Micah 2:2).
D. If it is true that emphasis is placed on that which is listed first
and last, the true significance of this command is seen. Exclusive worship of
God is first, but our attitudes and motives toward the things of this world
affect our true devotion to God. This twin emphasis is also seen in Jesus’
Sermon on the Mount, Matt. 6:33 —”But seek first His kingdom and His
righteousness; and all these things (cf. vv. 19-32) shall be added to you.”
II. WORD AND PHRASE STUDY
A. Exodus 20:17 and Deuteronomy 5:21, although basically the same,
have several significant differences:
1. The wife is included in the larger concept of “house” or a
person’s property in Exodus 20, while she is placed in a separate, seemingly
priority, category in Deuteronomy 5.
2. The passage in Exodus 20 has the Hebrew term “covet” which
means “desire to acquire,” but Deuteronomy 5 has a second term, “desire” (BDB
16, KB 20), as well
as “covet.” “Covet” speaks of desire which is connected to an action to acquire
the object of the desire but “desire” seems to focus on the attitude alone.
3. Also, Exodus 20, written to the children of Israel during
their wilderness wandering period, has no mention of “field” in the list of
possessions, while Deuteronomy 5 is restating the same commands for a settled
society in the Promised Land.
B. The term “covet” is a neutral term. It can refer to desiring good
things (cf. Ps. 19:10; 1 Cor. 12:31).
C. Improper desire is the root cause of the fall of Satan, Adam and
Eve, and all of us. Paul stressed his personal struggle with coveting in Romans
7:7-8. Coveting is basically a discontentment and lack of trust in God’s care
and provision.
D. Several NT passages relate to coveting:
1. Mankind’s problem is discontentment and greed (cf. Luke 12:15;
1 Tim. 6:8-10).
2. Coveting is included in Jesus’ list of defiling sins (cf.
Mark 7:17-23; 1 Cor. 5:10; Eph. 5:5; Col. 3:5).
III. APPLICATION TRUTHS
A. The answer to lustful greed and discontentment is:
1. Love – Rom. 13:8-10
2. Contentment – Heb. 13:5; Phil. 4:11-13 (and sharing, Phil.
4:14)
B. The command says “stop” but only Christ gave us the means to stop! In Him we can control our thought life to some degree.
C. God knows our hearts and minds
1. 1 Chronicles 28:9
2. Proverbs 20:27
3. Psalm 139:1,23
4. Jeremiah 17:10
5. Romans 8:27
6. Revelation 2:23
D. Things are not evil, but when they become priority they become sin. Things are not ultimate or eternal; people made in God’s image are! Coveting
affects the Covenant Community in insidious and destructive ways!
IV. ADDITIONAL NOTES FROM DEUTERONOMY 5:21:
Deuteronomy 5:21,
“shall not covet. . .shall not desire,” uses two verbs which are synonymous:
A. “covet” – BDB 326, KB 325, Qal
imperfect, means “a strong desire” for material things, which can be
positive or negative. In this context it is an uncontrollable, selfish desire
for something which belongs to a covenant brother.
B. “desire” – BDB 16, KB 20, Hipthpael
imperfect, means “desire” (cf. Deut. 14:26) or “lust” (often has a sexual
context as in 5:21) for more and more for me at any cost (e.g., Num. 11:4; Ps.
106:14; Pro. 13:4; 21:26; 23:3,6; 24:1).
This relates to one’s inner attitudes and motives. It is capstone to all the
other commandments. This is the only commandment that deals with why, not how.
This one says not only “don’t do” but “don’t think this.” Jesus taught that we
should not only not kill, we should not hate, or display an attitude that might
result in murder. Jesus took this last commandment and raised the rest of the
commandments to the level of inner motive and attitude as over against outer
action (cf. Matt. 5:17-48). There is all the difference in the world in a man
who does not steal because it is not pleasing to God and the man who does not
steal because he is afraid of getting caught. One is acting on Christian
principles and the other is acting on self-interest.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. What is coveting?
2. How does modern man covet?
3. Are our thoughts sin?
4. Why are thoughts so significant in the Christian life?
5. Why is the commandment in Exodus 20:17 somewhat different from the one in
Deuteronomy 5:21?
Copyright © 2014 Bible Lessons International