PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS
| NKJV | NRSV | TEV | NJB |
| Israel’s Sinfulness and God’s Punishment (3:1-6:14) |
Israel Warned and Threatened (3:1-6:14) |
||
| A Lament for Israel | The Horror and Finality of Israel’s Deserved Punishment (5:1-6:14) |
A Call to Repentance | Lament for Israel |
| 5:1-3 (2) |
5:1-2 (2) |
5:1-2 (2) |
5:1-2 (1-2) |
| (3) | 5:3 (3) |
5:3 | 5:3 (3) |
| A Call to Repentance | No Salvation without Repentance | ||
| 5:4-9 (4b-7) |
5:4-5 (4-5) |
5:4-5 | 5:4-7 (4-7) |
| 5:6-7 (6-7) |
5:6-7 | Doxology | |
| (8-9) | 5:8-9 (8-9) |
5:8-9 (8-9) |
5:8-9 (8-9) |
| Threats | |||
| 5:10-13 (10-13) |
5:10-13 (10-13) |
5:10-13 | 5:10-13 (10-13) |
| Exhortations | |||
| 5:14-15 (14-15) |
5:14-15 (14-15) |
5:14-15 | 5:14-15 (14-15) |
| The Day of the Lord | Impending Punishment | ||
| 5:16-17 (16b-17) |
5:16-17 (16-17) |
5:16-17 | 5:16-17 (16-17) |
| The Day of YHWH | |||
| 5:18-20 (18-20) |
5:18-20 (18-20) |
5:18-20 | 5:18-20 (18-20) |
| Against Formalism in Religion | |||
| 5:21-24 (21-24) |
5:21-24 (21-24) |
5:21-24 | 5:21-27 (21-27) |
| 5:25-27 (25-27) |
5:25-27 | 5:25-27 |
READING CYCLE THREE (see
“Bible
Interpretation Seminar”)
FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR’S INTENT AT PARAGRAPH LEVEL
This is a study guide commentary, which
means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the
light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not
relinquish this to a commentator.
Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects (reading cycle #3). Compare
your subject divisions with the five translations above. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is
the key to following the original author’s intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every
paragraph has one and only one subject.
WORD AND PHRASE STUDY
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:1-3
1Hear this word which I take up for you as a dirge, O house of Israel:
2She has fallen, she will not rise again—
The virgin Israel.
She lies neglected on her land;
There is none to raise her up.
3For thus says the Lord God,
“The city which goes forth a thousand strong
Will have a hundred left,
And the one which goes forth a hundred strong
Will have ten left to the house of Israel.”
5:1 “Hear” See note at Amos 3:1.
▣ “dirge” This is a specialized poetic structure that is found in Amos 5:2-6 and
Amos 5:16-17. This Hebrew word “dirge” (BDB 884) refers to a particular poetic beat pattern of 3-2, 3-2
(e.g., 2 Sam. 1:19-27; 3:33-34). It is used quite extensively in the book of Lamentations. This form
characterized funeral songs or chants (cf. Amos 5:16-17, 18-20). These songs were an expected
part of the funeral service.
▣ “O house of Israel” The term “house” (BDB 108) is used in the sense of family or
descendants (cf. Amos 1:4,5; 7:9). The phrase “house of Israel” is used several times by Amos
(cf. Amos 5:1,3,4,25; 6:1,14; 7:10,16; 9:9) to refer to the Northern Ten Tribes that split off from Judah in
922 B.C.. in the reign of Rehoboam. These tribes took for themselves the name of the
father of the Hebrew tribes “Israel” (Jacob).
Twice in Amos the phrase “house of Jacob” is used (cf. Amos 3:13; 9:8). It if often
difficult to know if Amos is referring only to the northern tribes or if he is addressing all the descendants
of Jacob/Israel.
5:2 “she has fallen” This (BDB 656, KB 709, Qal PERFECT) is a PROPHETIC
PERFECT that describes something that will happen in the future as if it has already occurred. The term
was used of death in battle (e.g., Jer. 9:22; 46:12; Lam. 2:21; Hos. 7:7).
▣ “she will not rise again” There are two VERBS:
- “no more” (BDB 414, KB 418 is a Hiphil IMPERFECT)
- “to rise” (BDB 877, KB 1086, Qal INFINITIVE CONSTRUCT)
YHWH’s judgment on Israel’s eclectic religion is total, complete, once-and-for-all judgment (cf. Amos 7:9).
However, this very same VERB is used in Amos 9:11(twice) to
promise a restoration of the royal house of Judah (i.e., “the fallen booth of David”). So again, the
theological issue is:
- God’s message presented in contrasting black and white truths (dialectic paradoxes)
- chapter 9 refers only to Judah, not Israel
▣ “the virgin Israel” This term is parallel with “house of Israel.” God took special
care and provided protection for them, like an unmarried daughter or bride to be (cf. Jer. 18:13; 31:4,21).
This reflects the marriage metaphor of God as husband and His covenant people as wife (e.g., Isa. 54:5;
Hosea 2:19; Eph. 5:22-33). The later rabbis saw the wilderness wandering period as the honeymoon
(cf. Jer. 2:2-3; Hos. 2:16). But now the context is of the rape and death of Israel by the Assyrian invasion.
For more information on this idiom, see Jer. 46:11 online at
www.freebiblecommentary.org.
▣ “She lies neglected on her land” The VERB (BDB 643, KB 695,
Niphal PERFECT) means forsaken, abandoned to plunder. The land of promise is
now the place of judgment.
There is a very interesting article in NIDOTTE, vol. 1, pp. 522-524, on the theological
aspect of “the land” as YHWH’s gift to the descendants of Abraham (cf. Gen. 12:3). Many of the Mosaic
statutes are based on this concept. This is the reason why cheating fellow covenant brothers out of their
family/tribal inheritance was so offensive to God. God’s concern for the land can be seen in “the Sabbath
Year” and “Jubilee Year” regulations. These wealthy land grabbers had totally ignored or willfully rejected
the theological basis of YHWH’s ownership and division of the Promised Land.
▣ “There is none to raise her up” This is the same VERBAL (BDB 877, KB 1086,
Hiphil PARTICIPLE) used earlier in the verse (Qal INFINITIVE
CONSTRUCT). It seems to be a sarcastic allusion to the inability of the Canaanite gods (whom Israel
worshiped) to rescue her from YHWH’s judgment (cf. Amos 5:6). The powerlessness, the non-existence of
Canaanite deities is ridiculed!
5:3 This was one of the covenant curses (the terms “thousands” [BDB 48] and “hundreds” [BDB 547]
were military units). The emphasis in this verse is not on a remnant returning (cf. Isa. 6:13), but on the
extreme military devastation that will occur. National Israel will permanently cease to exist.
SPECIAL TOPIC: THOUSAND (eleph)
SPECIAL TOPIC: WHY DO OT COVENANT
PROMISES SEEM SO DIFFERENT FROM NT COVENANT PROMISES?
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:4-7
4 For thus says the Lord to the house of Israel, “Seek Me that you may live.
5But do not resort to Bethel,
And do not come to Gilgal,
Nor cross over to Beersheba;
For Gilgal will certainly go into captivity
And Bethel will come to trouble.
6Seek the Lord that you may live,
Or He will break forth like a fire, O house of Joseph,
And it will consume with none to quench it for Bethel,
7For those who turn justice into wormwood
And cast righteousness down to the earth.”
5:4 “seek Me” The Hebrew VERB (BDB 205, KB 233) is a Qal IMPERATIVE
(cf. Amos 5:6,14-15). The connotation of the Hebrew phrase “to seek” involved going to a sanctuary,
however, the context of Amos 5:5 demands that we must seek God on an individual, as well as corporate, basis
(cf. Deut. 4:29-30; 30:1-3,10), not just in religious ritual. Our attitudes, motives, and lifestyle faith are crucial. Basically
this is a call to repentance to those who already knew (covenantal aspect) YHWH (cf. Rev. 3:20). Fellowship with
YHWH demands an ethical life.
In Amos 5:4 Amos says, “Seek the Lord.” This same VERB is also found
in Amos 5:14, “seek good and not evil.” These three are somewhat parallel. YHWH is said several times to
be good (e.g., Ps. 86:5; 100:5; 106:1; 107:1; 118:1,29). Therefore, seeking “Me” and seeking “good” may refer
to YHWH (notice the second line of Amos 5:14). This same symbolism can be seen in Hosea 8:2-3.
The Hebrew term “seek” has several meanings.
- inquire of
- seek a deity in prayer and worship
- investigate (to know the heart)
- ask or demand
In this context #2 fits best (cf. Deut. 4:29; Hosea 10:12; Isa. 9:13; 31:1; 55:6; 65:10).
| ▣ | |
| NASB | ”that you may live” |
| NKJV, NRSV | ”and live” |
| TEV, JPSOA, LXX, Peshitta | ”and you will live” |
| NJB | ”and you will survive” |
| REB | ”if you would live” |
The NKJV and NRSV are literal. The VERB (BDB 310, KB 309) is a
Qal IMPERATIVE parallel to “seek.” The sense of the IMPERATIVE
is seen in the NASB, TEV, and NJB. Israel’s survival as a covenant nation is the issue! This use
of “live” is similar to John 10:10! YHWH is merciful, if they turn back to Him, He will pardon,
restore, and protect (i.e., as in Holy War). This is theologically parallel with John 10:10.
This outburst of mercy is a plea from the heart of God who does not want to destroy
His own covenant people (cf. Hos. 11:8-11).
5:5 “Bethel. . .Gilgal. . .Beersheba” These are all local centers of worship. The first two were in
Israel and the third in southern Judah (cf. 2 Kgs. 23:8; Gen. 21:14, 31; 26:25,33; 46:1).
▣ “Beersheba” This was an ancient holy site connected to the Patriarchs (Abraham,
Gen. 21:33; Isaac, Gen. 26:23-25; Jacob, Gen. 28:10; 46:1-7) located in southern Judah.
▣ “For Gilgal will certainly go into captivity” Amos is a skilled poet. Here he uses
a sound play between “Gilgal” and “to go into exile” (BDB 162, KB 191, a Qal INFINITIVE
ABSOLUTE and a Qal IMPERFECT of the same term, which is a grammatical
feature showing intensity). Hebrew poetry is characterized by thought parallelism, multiple meanings of
words, and sound plays.
▣ “And Bethel will come to trouble” This seems to be a contrast between Bethel
(house of God) and what it had become (house of idolatry, cf. Hos. 4:15; 5:8; 10:5,8).
One of the meanings of “trouble” (BDB 19) can be idolatry (i.e., “nothing,”cf. Isa. 41:29; 66:3).
5:6 “Seek the Lord that you may live” This is parallel to Amos 5:4.
▣ “He will break forth like a fire” This may be another allusion to Deuteronomy (cf. Amos 4:24). Fire
is a metaphor for the cleansing power of God or to put it another way, His holiness!
▣ “O house of Joseph” It is unusual for Israel to be called the “house of Joseph” (cf. Amos 6:6). It
is usually called the “house of Jacob” (or “house of Israel,” e.g., Amos 5:1). However, Ephraim and Manasseh,
Joseph’s two children, make up the largest land holdings and the most populous tribes of the northern kingdom.
| ▣ | |
| NASB | ”for Bethel” |
| NKJV | ”in Bethel” |
| NRSV, REB, JPSOA, Peshitta | ”Bethel” |
| TEV | ”the people of Bethel” |
| NJB | ”at Bethel” |
| LXX, JPSOA footnote | ”the House of Israel” |
| NEB | ”Israel” |
The MT has “for Bethel” (NASB). The UBS Text Project, p. 283, gives the MT a “C” rating
(considerable doubt). The NEB follows the LXX, which is a better parallel to “house of Joseph” in the poetic line
before. However, it must be admitted that “Bethel” (i.e., “house of God”) is mentioned earlier twice in v. 5, but “the
house of Israel” also occurs in vv. 1,3.
5:7 “for those who turn justice into wormwood” “Justice” is a parallel to “righteousness.” These two
terms often appear together in the same context in the OT (cf. 2 Sam. 8:15; 1 Kgs. 10:9; 1 Chr. 18:14; 2 Chr. 9:8;
Ps. 99:4; Isa. 1:21; 5:7; 9:7; 28:17; 32:1,16; 33:5; 59:14; Jer. 4:2; 9:24; 22:3,15; 23:5; 33:15; Ezek. 18:5,19,21,27;
33:14,16,19; 45:9; Amos 5:7,24). This is not the “justification by faith,” imputed righteousness of the New
Covenant, but the Old Covenant mandate that YHWH wanted a people to fully reveal His character
(cf. Matt. 5:19-20,48). However, sinful fallen mankind, even the covenant people, were unable to live out the
holiness of God!
The PARTICIPLE (BDB 245, KB 253, Qal PARTICIPLE),
when Israel is the subject, is used in a negative sense (cf. Amos 5:7; 6:12; Jer. 2:21). In Amos 4:11 Amos
mentioned Sodom and Gomorrah as being overthrown, using the same root but with YHWH as the subject.
Wormwood (BDB 542) refers to any plant that is bitter (cf. UBS’s Fauna and Flora
of the Bible, p. 198). The rich had prevented justice. The legal system was a bitter thing to the poor, not
a haven (cf. Amos 5:12; 6:12). This may be another allusion to idolatry in Deuteronomy (cf. Deut. 29:18;
Jer. 9:14; 23:15). The cognate in Arabic means “curse.”
| ▣ | |
| NASB | ”cast righteousness down to the earth” |
| NKJV | ”lay righteousness to rest in the earth” |
| NRSV | ”bring righteousness to the ground” |
| TEV | ”cheat people out of their rights” |
| NJB, REB | ”throw uprightness to the ground” |
The idea here is to cast down (BDB 245, KB 253, Qal PARTICIPLE)
with a view toward trampling underfoot (cf. Isaiah 28:2-3). Judges, like the king, were to represent YHWH.
Notice that “justice” and “righteousness” are parallel (cf. Amos 5:24; 6:12). There is an
ethical-practical aspect to biblical faith!
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:8-9
8He who made the Pleiades and Orion
And changes deep darkness into morning,
Who also darkens day into night,
Who calls for the waters of the sea
And pours them out on the surface of the earth,
The Lord is His name.
9It is He who flashes forth with destruction upon the strong,
So that destruction comes upon the fortress.
5:8-9 This is a poetic doxology to God as Creator and Judge. There are three of these doxologies
in Amos (cf. Amos 4: 4; 5:8-9; 9:5-6).
5:8 “the Pleiades” This is literally “heap” or “herd” (BDB 465, cf. Job 9:9, 38:31). This was
one of the brightest of the star clusters (Hesiod calls it “the seven sisters”) in the constellation
Taurus. The UBS, Translator’s Handbook, pp. 105, 242, asserts that in Palestine its setting
below the horizon introduces winter. This then makes the poetic lines refer to God not as creator
only, but active present controller (Providence) of the natural order.
▣ “Orion” This is literally “fool” (BDB 493) in the sense of aggressive. It is used to
refer to a rebel. The ancients identified this constellation with Nimrod (the warrior, cf. Gen. 10:8-9). It
was visible in the summer. God controls the seasons (i.e., the order and regularity of the natural
world)! Apparently, God’s creation and control of the stars (cf. Gen. 1:14-19) was a necessary theological
statement in the light of astral worship (cf. Amos 5:26).
▣ “changes deep darkness into morning” In context this speaks of God’s control of the
heavenly bodies (cf. Ps. 19: 24). This phrase may be parallel in concept to 4:13c.
▣ “Who calls for the waters of the sea” There are several theories as to the meaning of this phrase:
- it refers to the boundaries of the oceans (cf. Gen. 1:9-10)
- it refers to God, not Ba’al, as the source of rain (i.e., a blessing to support growth)
- it is possibly an allusion to the flood (a judgment motif, cf. Genesis 6)
God controls the waters of creation as He does the stars. Water is the only thing in Genesis 1
that is not said to have been spoken into existence by God (cf. Gen. 1:2).
▣ “The Lord is His name” The name in Hebrew was very
significant in describing the character of an individual. God’s name “YHWH” is from Exod. 3:14, from
the Hebrew VERB “to be.”
SPECIAL TOPIC: NAMES FOR DEITY
| 5:9 | |
| NASB, REB | ”flashes forth” |
| NKJV | ”He rains” |
| NRSV | ”flash out” |
| TEV, NJB | ”brings” |
The Hebrew term’s (BDB 114, KB 132, Hiphil PARTICIPLE)
meaning is in doubt. Its use in Job and the Psalms implies a cheerfulness or joy (meaning of the Arabic
root). However, that meaning does not fit Amos at all unless Amos is speaking sarcastically of YHWH
smiling at the destruction of idolatrous Israel and her military fortifications. The NASB takes its translation
from the possible meaning of the Hiphil, “let something flare up” (cf. NIDOTTE, vol. 1, p. 660).
The UBS Text Project, p. 284, gives a textual emendation that turns v. 9 into the names
for three constellations (i.e., gods).
- bull (BDB 993, KB 1417-1418)
- goat (BDB 736, KB 804)
- vintager (BDB 130, KB 148)
This forms a parallel with the mentioning of “the Pleiades (i.e., “the cluster”) and Orion”
(i.e., “the giant”) of v. 8.
▣ “the strong” This may refer to the economically and politically powerful (cf. Amos 5:10-13; 2:14).
The opposite of “the poor,” the very ones who take advantage of them! However, because of the parallel to
“fortresses,” it may refer to the Israeli military. Also see note above for a connection to constellations.
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:10-13
10They hate him who reproves in the gate,
And they abhor him who speaks with integrity.
11Therefore because you impose heavy rent on the poor
And exact a tribute of grain from them,
Though you have built houses of well-hewn stone,
Yet you will not live in them;
You have planted pleasant vineyards, yet you will not drink their wine.
12For I know your transgressions are many and your sins are great,
You who distress the righteous and accept bribes
And turn aside the poor in the gate.
13Therefore at such a time the prudent person keeps silent, for it is an evil time.
5:10 “They hate him who reproves in the gate” Those (honest judges, true witnesses) who tried to
stand up and defend the poor and helpless (exactly who this refers to is uncertain, some kind of legal advocate)
were vehemently attacked by the status quo leadership (cf. Isa. 59:14-15). This is another allusion to Deuteronomy’s
cursing and blessing section (cf. Deut. 27:25).
The gate was the place of justice in the ancient Near East (cf. Deut. 25:1-3; Ruth 4:1-12). This
is where the elders of the communities sat (cf. Deut. 19:12; 21:3,8,19; 21:3,8; 22:15; 25:7-8). These elders are
addressed by Amos.
▣ “abhor” This (BDB 1073, KB 1765, Piel IMPERFECT) is a strong
VERB, often used to denote God’s rejection of idolatry. It is parallel to “hate” (BDB 971, KB 1338,
Qal PERFECT) in this same verse.
| ▣ | |
| NASB | ”integrity” |
| NKJV, Peshitta | ”uprightly” |
| NRSV, NJB | ”the truth” |
| TEV | ”the whole truth” |
| REB | ”nothing less than the truth” |
| JPSOA | ”just” |
The term’s (BDB 1071) basic meaning is to be exact or straight. This metaphor for
moral/ethical uprightness was derived from the word for a palm tree. Notice its usage.
- Noah, Gen. 6:9
- Abraham, Gen. 17:1
- peace offerings, Lev. 22:21
- godly Israelites, Deut. 18:13; Prov. 2:7; 10:9
- God, Deut. 32:4 2 Sam. 22:31,33; Ps. 18; 30,32
- Job, Job 1:1,8; 2:3
- God’s word, Ps. 19:7
5:11a-b The first two poetic lines of this verse document some of the abuses of the poor:
- heavy rent (i.e., taken from Akkadian root) or trample on (i.e., taken from Hebrew root “to trample”
[BDB 143, KB 165, Poel INFINITIVE CONSTRUCT], cf. NKJV, NRSV, NJB) - a tax on food
- bribery at the gate (cf. Amos 5:12)
The term poor (see note at Amos 2:7) may refer to “peasant farmers” (see note at NIDOTTE,
vol. 1, p. 951).
5:11c-e This is another curse for violation of the Mosaic Covenant (cf. Deut. 28:30,39). The rich
had built luxurious homes (“well-hewn stone”) by exploiting the poor (cf. Amos 5:11-12). But God would
not let them live with their ill gotten gain (cf. Micah 6:15). This is an allusion to the Assyrian exile.
5:12 This verse, like Amos 5:10-11, lists the sins of the wealthy class against the poor (possibly
small farmers) and underprivileged. These are the very ones the ethical God cares about because of their
helplessness and vulnerability (cf. Deut. 10:18; 14:29; 16:11; 24:17-22; 26:12-13; 27:19). This is another
Deuteronomic emphasis. The prophets always looked back to the Mosaic Covenant.
The term translated “bribe” (BDB 497, cf. Exod. 23:8; Deut. 16:19; 27:25; 1 Sam. 12:3;
Prov. 6:35) is the same term used to describe God’s “covering,” “atoning” for sin. This important theological
term is used here in a derived sense of covering someone’s hand or eyes. It is a shocking use of a wonderful
theological term.
5:13 This is a very difficult verse because it seems to go against all that the prophet himself
advocates and practices. This again may be a play on the semantic field of the PARTICIPLE,
“he who is prudent” (BDB 968, KB 1328, Hiphil PARTICIPLE). The Hiphil can mean
- look at (to make one wise, cf. Gen. 3:6)
- give attention to (e.g., Deut. 32:29)
- have comprehension (e.g., Dan. 1:4; 9:25)
- give insight, teach (e.g., Dan. 9:22; 11:33,35)
- act prudently (e.g., Amos 5:13)
- prosper (e.g., Isa. 52:13; Jer. 10:21)
- cause to prosper (e.g., Deut. 29:9)
A good example of how this term can mean #5 or #6/#7 see Jer. 23:5. If so used here, this
may be another allusion to Deuteronomy (i.e., Deut. 29:9). They were meant to prosper in God’s blessing
(cf. Deuteronomy 27-29), but they were prospering because they were breaking Moses’ Covenant in
their treatment of the powerless of their society.
It is also possible (UBS, Handbook, pp. 106-109) to see the key to the structure
related to the two people addressed in Amos 5:10.
- “they hate. . .they abhor” (v. 10), this group is addressed in Amos 5:11-12
- “who reproves. . .who speaks with integrity” (v. 10), these were addressed in Amos 5:13
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:14-15
14 Seek good and not evil, that you may live;
And thus may the Lord God of hosts be with you,
Just as you have said!
15Hate evil, love good,
And establish justice in the gate!
Perhaps the Lord God of hosts
May be gracious to the remnant of Joseph.
5:14 “Seek good and not evil” Note the prophet’s sharp contrasts (cf. Amos 5:15). There is a choice
to be made which has eternal consequences. “Seek” (BDB 205, KB 233, Qal IMPERATIVE)
is another IMPERATIVE. Notice this IMPERATIVE’S relationship with those
in Amos 5:4, 6 that emphasize ethical lifestyles. It must be remembered that biblical faith has two foci: personal
relationship and deeds of love (cf. Eph. 2:8-10 and 1 John 3:23). Amos admonishes Israel to “seek good.” Isaiah
uses the same VERB to admonish God’s people to seek justice (cf. Isa. 1:17). What do we care
about, strive for, seek after? The answer tells us who we are and who/what we serve!
▣ “the Lord God of hosts be with you” This is the greatest
promise that God can make (cf. Ps. 23). The title “Lord God of Hosts” has
two related meanings in the OT: (1) YHWH as commander of the angelic army and (2) YHWH as controller of
the astral bodies that represent angelic powers (Babylonian idolatry).
SPECIAL TOPIC: NAMES FOR DEITY, D.
▣ “Just as you have said” Amos may have been referring to
- a common teaching of the priests/Levites
- an often used liturgy/psalm
- the recurrent claim that Israel was the covenant-chosen people (e.g., Exod. 19:5-6; Deut. 7:6; 14:2)
5:15 “Hate evil, love good,
And establish justice in the gate” These are three Hebrew IMPERATIVES:
- “hate” (BDB 971, KB 1338, Qal IMPERATIVE)
- “love” (BDB 12, KB 17, Qal IMPERATIVE)
- “establish” (BDB 426, KB 427, Hiphil IMPERATIVE)
These reflect the covenant of Moses. Notice that for Amos there is no distinction
between the secular and the sacred, between the heart and the hand (cf. Micah 6:8). God’s people must
reflect God’s character!
The term “establish” has the connotation of specific, purposeful action (e.g., Hos. 2:3). God’s
faithful must determine in their hearts and minds that justice, fairness, and integrity will prevail in their sphere
of influence.
▣ “Perhaps the Lord. . .May be gracious to the remnant of
Joseph” The prophet is asserting a limited hope (i.e., “perhaps” BDB 19) for those few Israelites who
would repent and live out their faith (i.e., “seek Me,” Amos 5:4; “seek the Lord,” Amos 5:6).
For “remnant” see SPECIAL
TOPIC: REMNANT (three senses)
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:16-17
16Therefore thus says the Lord God of hosts, the Lord,
“There is wailing in all the plazas,
And in all the streets they say, ‘Alas! Alas!’
They also call the farmer to mourning
And professional mourners to lamentation.
17And in all the vineyards there is wailing,
Because I will pass through the midst of you,” says the Lord.
5:16 “Therefore” This relates to Amos 5:10-13. It does not relate to the repeated admonition
to repent, begun in Amos 5:4-6 (key word, “seek”).
▣ “There is wailing in all the plazas. . .‘Alas! Alas'” The prophet began the funeral
dirge in Amos 5:1; now judgment has come and everybody is wailing. “Plazas” would be parallel to “gates”
or “markets.” Even the term “streets” (BDB 299) can mean plaza or market (e.g., 1 Kgs. 20:34).
▣ “farmer” I believe “farmer” is the referent to “the poor.” It was not the poor as in modern,
western cultures, but the small farmer on ancestral land (given by YHWH) who were being exploited. The
Mosaic stipulations of the Sabbath Year and the Jubilee Year were being ignored and land was permanently taken.
▣ “professional mourners” Near Eastern people are very expressive in their mourning rites. There
were trained people available to help in this cultural grieving process (cf. 2 Chr. 35:25; Jer. 9:17). See James M.
Freeman, Manners and Customs of the Bible, pp. 283-284.
5:17 “I will pass through the midst of you” This same phrase is used in Exod. 12:12 for the Death Angel
passing through Egypt in judgment on the night of Passover. God’s coming could be for blessing or judgment
(cf. Amos 5:18). Israel viewed it as a certain blessing, but Amos revealed that it would be for judgment. What an
ironic, tragic reversal (cf. Amos 5:18-20)! All humans made in God’s image sense their need for Him (cf. Amos 5:14b). He
wants to be with us, but our actions necessitate judgment, not fellowship!
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:18-20
18Alas, you who are longing for the day of the Lord,
For what purpose will the day of the Lord be to you?
It will be darkness and not light;
19As when a man flees from a lion
And a bear meets him,
Or goes home, leans his hand against the wall
And a snake bites him.
20Will not the day of the Lord be darkness instead of light,
Even gloom with no brightness in it?”
5:18 “Alas” This is literally “woe” (BDB 222). This is an interjection of grief and mourning over
the dead (cf. Amos 5:16; Jer. 22:18; 34:5).
▣ “you who are longing for the day of the Lord“ This VERB
(BDB 16, KB 20, Hiphil PARTICIPLE) means “desire for yourselves.” These people thought
God’s coming (i.e., “the day of the Lord“) would bring blessings and deliverance
because they were covenant people (cf. Amos 3:2). But because of this very reason, judgment would come. Because
of the blindness of their hearts, God was coming to them as Judge (cf. Amos 3:14; 5:18; 8:3,9,11,13), not Savior
(cf. Amos 9:11,13). Their religion resulted in a curse (cf. Deut. 27-29).
Amos is the first of the writing prophets and this is the first use of the phrase “the Day of
the Lord” (see note at Amos 2:16). It may have been a metaphor from the days of
“Holy War” (i.e., Joshua and Judges). YHWH was the ever-present provider and protector of His covenant people,
but in days of conflict His physical manifestation in miraculous ways delivered His people from danger. However,
Israel had so violated the covenant that its privilege had turned to judgment and rejection (cf. Joel 2).
SPECIAL TOPIC: THE DAY
OF THE LORD
▣ “It will be darkness and not light” This continues the contrast on these terms (cf. Amos 4:13c; 5:8c,20).
5:19 There is absolutely no place to flee from God’s judgment.
▣ “lion” See SPECIAL
TOPIC: LIONS IN THE OT
5:20 What irony! What tragedy!
▣ “with no brightness in it” The “brightness” (BDB 618) may be an allusion to the glory of God.
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:21-24
21“I hate, I reject your festivals,
Nor do I delight in your solemn assemblies.
22Even though you offer up to Me burnt offerings and your grain offerings,
I will not accept them;
And I will not even look at the peace offerings of your fatlings.
23Take away from Me the noise of your songs;
I will not even listen to the sound of your harps.
24But let justice roll down like waters
And righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.”
5:21-24 Do these verses show that God rejects the sacrificial system given in Leviticus 1-7? There
are many strong passages in the Prophets that show God’s displeasure at His people’s practice of the sacrificial
system (cf. Isa. 1:11-17; Jer. 6:20; 7:21-23; Hos. 6:6; Amos 5:21-27; Micah 6:8). The sacrificial system was YHWH’s
way of dealing with human sin so as to develop and continue a personal, loving, trusting relationship with His
highest creation. However, Israel not only turned it into mere ritual and form, but even merged it with pagan
practices. YHWH wants fellowship! YHWH wants a people who reflect His character! YHWH wants to reach all
humans through the witness of a chosen group (cf. Gen. 12:3; Exod. 19:5-6).
SPECIAL TOPIC: YHWH’S ETERNAL
REDEMPTIVE PLAN
5:21 “I hate, I reject your festivals,
Nor do I delight in your solemn assemblies” These are strong terms! They were very religious, but their
attitudes and hearts were far from God. Their religiosity was an abomination to God (cf. Isa. 29:13)! The first
two VERBS, “I hate” (BDB 971, KB 1338) and “I reject” (BDB 549, KB 540) are Qal
PERFECTS, which denote a settled, complete attitude.
The term “festivals” (BDB 290) is often used to denote the three major annual feasts
(cf. Exod. 23:15-16; Lev. 23). These were required feasts for all males.
The term “delight” (BDB 926, KB 1280, Hiphil IMPERFECT) is literally
“smell,” which refers to the Mosaic phrase “soothing aroma,” denoting YHWH’s acceptance of a sacrifice
(e.g., Gen. 8:21; Exod. 29:18,25; Lev. 26:31; 1 Sam. 26:19).
SPECIAL TOPIC: FEASTS OF ISRAEL
SPECIAL TOPIC: A SOOTHING AROMA
5:22 Religiosity without relationship is an abomination (cf. Isa. 1: 10-20; Jer. 7). YHWH does not
reject the sacrificial system, but its inappropriate use (ritual without repentant faith; form without appropriate attitude)!
▣ “I will not even look” “Look” (BDB 613, KB 661, Hiphil IMPERFECT) is
used in the sense of accept or acknowledge.
▣ “fatlings” This (BDB 597) refers to specially cared for young animals which were raised to be sacrificed.
5:23 “take away from Me the noise of your songs” This (BDB 693, KB 747) is a Hiphil IMPERATIVE
MASCULINE SINGULAR. Even sacred, glorious music without the proper motive is a farce, hypocrisy, and
an abomination to God. God desires motive, not only form!
This verse does show that the northern tribes adopted the worship forms (i.e., music developed
by the prophetic guilds, cf. 1 Sam. 10:5) of the temple in Jerusalem (developed by David, cf. 2 Sam. 6:5,15). The
leaders (Jeroboam I) wanted these northern altars (i.e., Dan and Bethel) to duplicate the worship techniques so
that the common people would not sense a difference.
It is surprising that the VERBS are SINGULAR. It is just possible
that in Amos 5:23 Amos is addressing the high priest at Bethel.
| ▣ | |
| NASB, NRSV, TEV, NIV, Peshitta | ”harps” |
| NKJV, NET | ”stringed instruments” |
| NJB | ”lyres” |
| REV, JPSOA | ”lutes” |
| LXX | ”instruments” |
As the number of English translations demonstrates, moderns do not know to what type
of stringed instrument this refers. To note the number of other instruments it is often associated with see
2 Sam. 6:5 and Ps. 92:3. It is possible that Assyrian wall pictures have depicted this instrument as strings with
a sounding box, something like our bass fiddle. See James M. Freeman, Manners and Customs of the Bible
pp. 221-222.
5:24 This is one of the most famous verses in Amos. God desires His people to focus on who He is, not
on certain worship days, but on every day. True faith is what we are, not what we do; but who we are will be clearly
seen in what we do, how we do it, and why we do it (cf. Matthew 7).
“Justice” and “righteousness” are parallel, as in Amos 5:7. In this context they refer to human
obedience to the Mosaic Covenant lived out in a proper relationship between God and worshiper—worshiped
and worshiper.
The VERB “roll down” (BDB 146, KB 193) is a Niphal JUSSIVE,
which denotes an IMPERATIVE sense.
▣ “an ever-flowing stream” This (BDB 450) refers to a spring that never runs dry (i.e., is not seasonal). It
is a powerful metaphor of a life of active faith (cf. Jer. 22:3; Ezek. 45:9; Micah 6:8).
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: AMOS 5:25-27
25“Did you present Me with sacrifices and grain offerings in the wilderness for forty years, O house of Israel? 26You also carried along Sikkuth your king and Kiyyun, your images, the star of your gods which you made for yourselves. 27Therefore, I will make you go into exile beyond Damascus,” says the Lord, whose name is the God of hosts.”
5:25 This is a very difficult verse to interpret. It can be a question (continues from Amos 5:25) or
an affirmation (linking it to Amos 5:27, cf. TEV). There have been two lines of interpretation:
- Amos is asserting that the children of Israel did not sacrifice in the wilderness (cf. Jer. 7:21-22 and NJB)
- although they did sacrifice in a limited (JB) way, the object of their sacrifice was not YHWH, but Assyrian
gods who were leading them (sarcasm) into exile.
5:26 There is much discussion on the time element of this verse. Does it refer to the forty years of
wilderness wandering of Amos 5:25 or does it refer to the future wanderings of the Assyrian exile? It seems
that because the idols mentioned are Assyrian star gods this verse is referring to current time or the future
exile, while Amos 5:25 refers to the wilderness wanderings after the Exodus from Egypt.
Another possibility is that Israel had made the sacrificial system ultimate when in fact they
could not perform it after they left Egypt for many years (no tabernacle). During those years personal trust in
God’s care, presence, and provision was the focus of their faith, not sacrifice. This does not depreciate the
sacrificial system. It was surely the will of God, but God Himself was the goal, not the ritual, liturgy, and
cultus! Motive and attitude were crucial!
Just a note about Stephen’s quote of Amos 5:25-27 in Acts 7:42-43. Most Jews of the first
century A.D. used the Septuagint translation of the OT. In some places it follows a different
text from the Masoretic Text. This is a problem! However, even in the Dead Sea Scrolls both traditions are
present. None of the verses affect the truth or trustworthiness of doctrine or practice. We must realize that
Christianity does not stand or fall on difference between the Hebrew OT and its ancient versions or NT
manuscript variation. See a discussion of this in Gleason Archer’s Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, pp 381-382.
▣ “Sikkuth your king” The LXX has “booth of,” however, this term is found in Assyrian documents
to refer to a war god named Adar-Melek-Saturn (Ninurta in Ugaritic). Notice a deity is called “king,” which
shows the cultural background for YHWH as king.
| ▣ | |
| NASB, JPSOA | ”Kiyyun” |
| NKJV, Pehsitta | ”Chiun” |
| NRSV, TEV, NJB | ”Kaiwan” |
| NIV, REB | ”the pedestal” |
| LXX | ”Raiphan” |
This also refers to an Assyrian star god, who is also identified with the planet Saturn
(BDB 475). The NASB reflects the Hebrew spelling which is a combination of the consonants of the name
of the star god, but the vowels from the Hebrew word “abominations” (BDB 1055, JPSOA footnote). This was a
common way for Hebrew scribes to ridicule the names of gods, kings, and nations (e.g., Sikkuth).
The spelling “Kaiwan” is from Akkadian or Arabic root.
The translation of the term as “pedestal” supposes that the term comes from the root,
“to be firm” (kwn).
5:27 “I will make you go into exile beyond Damascus” This refers to the Assyrian exile, which
occurred in 722 B.C. after a three year siege of Samaria (cf. possibly 4:3; and Hos. 9:3;
10:6; 11:5). This again is an allusion to the cursings and blessings section of Deuteronomy 27-29.
▣ “says the Lord, whose name is God of hosts” One of the
names for Israel’s God is “YHWH of hosts” or “YHWH Sabaoth” (cf. 1 Sam. 1:3). In this text Elohim is
substituted for YHWH. Here the title is connected to God as the controller of a heavenly army (i.e., the stars).
YHWH, not astral deities (i.e., Assyrian star gods), was Israel’s hope!
The worship of the lights of the sky is condemned in many texts (cf. Deut. 4:19; 8:2; 17:2-5;
2 Kgs. 23:4-5,11; Jer. 8:2; 19:13; 32:29; Zeph. 1:5). The OT asserts several times that God created and controls
the heavenly lights (cf. Gen. 1:14-19; Ps. 19:1-6; Neh. 9:6). It is in connection with these texts
that “Lord of hosts” is a condemnation of idolatry (the worship of
gods/angels/spirits of the heavenly lights, cf. LXX of Deut. 32:8).
SPECIAL TOPIC: THE LORD
OF HOSTS
Copyright © 2014 Bible Lessons International